DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No. 10607-11
5 March 2012
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TOs Secretary of the Navy
Subj]: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/070
of 14 Feb 12
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was
advanced to E-5/MA2 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement
exam.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and
George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 5 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
Docket No. 00601-12
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MA2 from the March 2009
Navy-wide advancement examination with an effective date of 16
December 2009, and a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2009.
NOTE: Petitioner's two prier applications for correction to her
September 2009 Navy-wide advancement exams are no longer
applicable since the approved correction by the Board was Fox
March 2009 exam (prior to the September 2009 exam). In
addition, this change requires Petitioner’s command to
administratively correct her previous E-5 evaluations.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
5 March 2012 lp
Executive Dite
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00712-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. Upon being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status in December 2010, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had advanced...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02859-10
f. In February 2010, Petitioner submitted this request to the Board for Corrections of Naval Records (BCNR) requesting to validate his February 2008 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam and advancement to E-5/MA2, enclosure (1). * NPC stated that advancement in the MA rating required completion of MA “A” school and that Petitioner did not receive the “A” school waiver until 18 March 2009, after the February 2008 and February 2009 advancement examination cycles. Accordingly, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07868-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 07868-09 26 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3503-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12035 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to E-6/PR1 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, 4salman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8640 13
_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NROQ8640-13 11 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: iia? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/STS3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00082-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was either advanced to E-4/LS3 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam or received Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) points from the March 2009 advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6068 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MA2 £rom the February 2013 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Mr. Vogt, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that che corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00601 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/LS2 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07108-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MAl from the February 2008 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s...